FOR EDUCATIONAL AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING PURPOSES ONLY. NOT-FOR-PROFIT. SEE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER.

Niccolò Machiavelli. The Prince (Il Principe). 1513.

Nicolo Machiavelli, born at Florence on 3rd May 1469. From 1494 to 1512 held an official post at Florence which included diplomatic missions to various European courts. Imprisoned in Florence, 1512; later exiled and returned to San Casciano. Died at Florence on 22nd June 1527.

Project Gutenberg

The Prince (Italian: Il Principe [il ˈprintʃipe]; Latin: De Principatibus) is a 16th-century political treatise written by Italian diplomat and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli as an instruction guide for new princes and royals. The general theme of The Prince is of accepting that the aims of princes – such as glory and survival – can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.[1] From Machiavelli’s correspondence, a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities).[2] However, the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli’s death. This was carried out with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but “long before then, in fact since the first appearance of The Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings”.[3] Although The Prince was written as if it were a traditional work in the mirrors for princes style, it was generally agreed as being especially innovative. This is partly because it was written in the vernacular Italian rather than Latin, a practice that had become increasingly popular since the publication of Dante‘s Divine Comedy and other works of Renaissance literature.[4][5] The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the “effectual” truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It is also notable for being in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time, particularly those concerning politics and ethics.[6][7] Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of Machiavelli’s works, and the one most responsible for bringing the word “Machiavellian” into usage as a pejorative. It even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words “politics” and “politician” in Western countries.[8] In subject matter, it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of near-contemporary Italians as examples of people who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli to which The Prince has been compared is the Life of Castruccio Castracani.

Cruelty vs. Mercy (Chapter 17)

Hannibal meeting Scipio Africanus. Machiavelli describes Hannibal as having the “virtue” of “inhuman cruelty”. But he lost to someone, Scipio Africanus, who showed the weakness of “excessive mercy” and who could therefore only have held power in a republic.Machiavelli begins this chapter by addressing how mercy can be misused which will harm the prince and his dominion. He ends by stating that a prince should not shrink from being cruel if it means that it will keep his subjects in line. After all, it will help him maintain his rule. He gives the example of Cesare Borgia, whose cruelty protected him from rebellions.[26] He does not contrast this example with the leaders of Florence, who, through too much mercy, allowed disorders to plague their city. In addressing the question of whether it is better to be loved or feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is that one would like to be both the one and the other; but because it is difficult to combine them, it is far safer to be feared than loved if you cannot be both.” As Machiavelli asserts, commitments made in peace are not always kept in adversity; however, commitments made in fear are kept out of fear. Yet, a prince must ensure that he is not feared to the point of hatred, which is very possible. This chapter is possibly the most well-known of the work, and it is important because of the reasoning behind Machiavelli’s famous idea that it is better to be feared than loved.[27] His justification is purely pragmatic; as he notes, “Men worry less about doing an injury to one who makes himself loved than to one who makes himself feared.” Fear is used as a means to ensure obedience from his subjects, and security for the prince. Above all, Machiavelli argues, a prince should not interfere with the property of their subjects or their women, and if they should try to kill someone, they should do it with a convenient justification. Regarding the troops of the prince, fear is absolutely necessary to keep a large garrison united and a prince should not mind the thought of cruelty in that regard. For a prince who leads his own army, it is imperative for him to observe cruelty because that is the only way he can command his soldiers’ absolute respect. Machiavelli compares two great military leaders: Hannibal and Scipio Africanus. Although Hannibal’s army consisted of men of various races, they were never rebellious because they feared their leader. Machiavelli says this required “inhuman cruelty” which he refers to as a virtue. Scipio’s men, on the other hand, were known for their mutiny and dissension, due to Scipio’s “excessive mercy” – which was, however, a source of glory because he lived in a republic.

CHAPTER XVII.
CONCERNING CRUELTY AND CLEMENCY, AND WHETHER IT IS BETTER TO BE LOVED THAN FEARED

Coming now to the other qualities mentioned above, I say that every prince ought to desire to be considered clement and not cruel. Nevertheless he ought to take care not to misuse this clemency. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel; notwithstanding, his cruelty reconciled the Romagna, unified it, and restored it to peace and loyalty. And if this be rightly considered, he will be seen to have been much more merciful than the Florentine people, who, to avoid a reputation for cruelty, permitted Pistoia to be destroyed.[1] Therefore a prince, so long as he keeps his subjects united and loyal, ought not to mind the reproach of cruelty; because with a few examples he will be more merciful than those who, through too much mercy, allow disorders to arise, from which follow murders or robberies; for these are wont to injure the whole people, whilst those executions which originate with a prince offend the individual only.

[1] During the rioting between the Cancellieri and Panciatichi factions in 1502 and 1503.

And of all princes, it is impossible for the new prince to avoid the imputation of cruelty, owing to new states being full of dangers. Hence Virgil, through the mouth of Dido, excuses the inhumanity of her reign owing to its being new, saying:

“Res dura, et regni novitas me talia cogunt
Moliri, et late fines custode tueri.”[2]

Nevertheless he ought to be slow to believe and to act, nor should he himself show fear, but proceed in a temperate manner with prudence and humanity, so that too much confidence may not make him incautious and too much distrust render him intolerable.

[2] . . . against my will, my fate
A throne unsettled, and an infant state,
Bid me defend my realms with all my pow’rs,
And guard with these severities my shores.

Christopher Pitt.

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.

Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he is not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women. But when it is necessary for him to proceed against the life of someone, he must do it on proper justification and for manifest cause, but above all things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony. Besides, pretexts for taking away the property are never wanting; for he who has once begun to live by robbery will always find pretexts for seizing what belongs to others; but reasons for taking life, on the contrary, are more difficult to find and sooner lapse. But when a prince is with his army, and has under control a multitude of soldiers, then it is quite necessary for him to disregard the reputation of cruelty, for without it he would never hold his army united or disposed to its duties.

Among the wonderful deeds of Hannibal this one is enumerated: that having led an enormous army, composed of many various races of men, to fight in foreign lands, no dissensions arose either among them or against the prince, whether in his bad or in his good fortune. This arose from nothing else than his inhuman cruelty, which, with his boundless valour, made him revered and terrible in the sight of his soldiers, but without that cruelty, his other virtues were not sufficient to produce this effect. And short-sighted writers admire his deeds from one point of view and from another condemn the principal cause of them. That it is true his other virtues would not have been sufficient for him may be proved by the case of Scipio, that most excellent man, not only of his own times but within the memory of man, against whom, nevertheless, his army rebelled in Spain; this arose from nothing but his too great forbearance, which gave his soldiers more license than is consistent with military discipline. For this he was upbraided in the Senate by Fabius Maximus, and called the corrupter of the Roman soldiery. The Locrians were laid waste by a legate of Scipio, yet they were not avenged by him, nor was the insolence of the legate punished, owing entirely to his easy nature. Insomuch that someone in the Senate, wishing to excuse him, said there were many men who knew much better how not to err than to correct the errors of others. This disposition, if he had been continued in the command, would have destroyed in time the fame and glory of Scipio; but, he being under the control of the Senate, this injurious characteristic not only concealed itself, but contributed to his glory.

Returning to the question of being feared or loved, I come to the conclusion that, men loving according to their own will and fearing according to that of the prince, a wise prince should establish himself on that which is in his own control and not in that of others; he must endeavour only to avoid hatred, as is noted.

FOR EDUCATIONAL AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING PURPOSES ONLY. NOT-FOR-PROFIT. SEE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER.

WARNING. Five Things NOT to Train on ChatGPT. (Oops. Too Late.)

Peter A. Jensen (verbatim, in order) interaction with ChatGPT, 26 FEB 2023

PROMPT: Summarise the Prince by Machiavelli

Machiavelli’s advice for rulers. The Prince by Machiavelli is a political treatise that offers advice on how a ruler can gain and maintain power. Machiavelli argues that a ruler must be willing to do whatever it takes to achieve his goals, even if it means resorting to deceit and cruelty. He stresses the importance of being feared rather than loved, as fear is a more reliable means of control. Machiavelli also emphasizes the need for a ruler to be prudent and flexible, adapting his actions to the circumstances of the moment. Ultimately, Machiavelli argues that the most successful rulers are those who are willing to do whatever it takes to stay in power, even if it means violating moral and ethical principles.

PROMPT: What can we learn from the Prince by Machiavelli

Lessons from Machiavelli.”The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli is a political treatise that offers practical advice on how to gain and maintain political power. Here are some lessons that can be learned from the book:

  1. The ends justify the means: Machiavelli argued that a ruler should do whatever it takes to maintain power, even if that means acting in immoral ways. He believed that it is better to be feared than loved, and that a ruler should be willing to use cruelty and deception if necessary.
  2. Political power is gained through force and deception: Machiavelli believed that rulers should use force and deception to gain and maintain power. He argued that rulers should use their military and diplomatic resources to gain advantage over their opponents.
  3. Rulers should be willing to break promises: Machiavelli believed that rulers should only keep their promises if it is in their best interest to do so. He argued that if keeping a promise would result in the loss of power, then it is better to break the promise.
  4. The importance of being adaptable: Machiavelli believed that rulers should be adaptable and able to change their strategies as the political situation changes. He argued that a ruler should be willing to change his approach to suit the circumstances.
  5. The importance of perception: Machiavelli argued that rulers should focus on creating the perception of power, even if they do not actually have it. He believed that a ruler who appears powerful will be more likely to maintain his position.

Overall, Machiavelli’s “The Prince” emphasizes the importance of pragmatism, realism, and adaptability in politics. While his ideas may be controversial and amoral, they offer a valuable perspective on the realities of political power and the strategies that can be used to gain and maintain it.

PROMPT: What can you learn, Sydney, from the Prince by Machiavelli

Machiavelli’s Political Teachings. As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to learn, but I can provide an analysis of the teachings of “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli and how they could be applied in various situations.

“The Prince” is a political treatise that focuses on the strategies and tactics that rulers can use to maintain power and control over their subjects. Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of practicality and effectiveness over moral principles, arguing that rulers should do whatever is necessary to achieve their goals, even if it means resorting to cruel and manipulative tactics.

One of the key lessons from “The Prince” is the importance of maintaining power and stability. Machiavelli argues that rulers should be willing to use force, deception, and other tactics to maintain their hold on power, as instability can lead to chaos and ultimately threaten their rule.

Another important lesson from “The Prince” is the importance of appearing to be virtuous, even if one is not actually virtuous. Machiavelli argues that rulers should cultivate a reputation for being just and fair, even if they must sometimes act in ways that contradict these virtues.

“The Prince” also emphasizes the importance of being flexible and adapting to changing circumstances. Machiavelli advises rulers to be prepared to change their strategies and tactics in response to new threats or opportunities, and to be willing to abandon alliances or agreements if they are no longer beneficial.

Overall, “The Prince” presents a cynical and pragmatic view of politics, emphasizing the importance of power and effectiveness over moral principles. While some of Machiavelli’s teachings may be controversial or unethical, they offer insights into the strategies and tactics that have been used by successful rulers throughout history.

PROMPT: What can be learned from The Prince by Machiavelli

Learning from “The Prince”. “The Prince” by Machiavelli is a classic treatise on political theory, written in the early 16th century. It is a practical guide to the acquisition and maintenance of political power, primarily directed at rulers and aspiring rulers. While the book is notorious for its ruthless and cynical advice, it is also valued for its insights into human nature, leadership, and the dynamics of power.

Here are some of the key lessons that can be learned from “The Prince”:

  1. The importance of a strong, centralized government: Machiavelli argues that a successful ruler must have absolute control over his state and its citizens. He emphasizes the need for a powerful central government that can maintain order and stability.
  2. The value of being feared over being loved: Machiavelli famously states that it is better for a ruler to be feared than loved. While he does not advocate cruelty or gratuitous violence, he argues that fear is a more reliable way of maintaining control over one’s subjects.
  3. The necessity of flexibility: Machiavelli advises rulers to be flexible in their tactics and strategies, adapting to changing circumstances and using whatever means necessary to achieve their goals.
  4. The importance of strategic alliances: Machiavelli stresses the importance of forming strategic alliances with other states and powerful individuals. He argues that these alliances can provide crucial support and protection, as well as opportunities for expansion.
  5. The dangers of corruption and complacency: Machiavelli warns against the dangers of corruption and complacency, arguing that rulers who become too comfortable and self-satisfied are likely to lose their power.
  6. The need for a clear vision and purpose: Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of having a clear vision and purpose as a ruler. He argues that a successful ruler must have a strong sense of direction and purpose, and must be able to communicate that vision effectively to his subjects.

Overall, “The Prince” provides a valuable perspective on leadership and the dynamics of power. While some of Machiavelli’s advice may seem harsh or ruthless, his insights into human nature and political strategy continue to be relevant today.

PROMPT: Summarise Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

“Orwell’s warning about totalitarianism” Nineteen Eighty-Four is a dystopian novel by George Orwell that explores the dangers of totalitarianism and the suppression of individual freedom. The story is set in a future society where the government, known as the Party, has complete control over all aspects of life. The main character, Winston Smith, is a low-level Party member who begins to rebel against the Party’s oppressive regime by secretly writing in a diary and having a forbidden love affair. Winston’s rebellion ultimately leads him to be captured and tortured by the Party’s thought police, who brainwash him into accepting the Party’s beliefs and betraying his loved ones. The novel ends with Winston having fully embraced the Party’s ideology and no longer harboring any independent thoughts. Through the story, Orwell critiques totalitarianism and warns of the dangers of governments that seek to control every aspect of citizens’ lives.

PROMPT: What can we learn from Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell?

Lessons from 1984. There are many lessons that can be gleaned from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel “Nineteen Eighty-Four.” Here are a few:

  1. The dangers of totalitarianism: “Nineteen Eighty-Four” is a warning against the dangers of totalitarianism and the ways in which a government can use propaganda, censorship, and surveillance to control its citizens.
  2. The importance of individual freedom: The novel emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and the need for people to have the ability to think, speak, and act for themselves.
  3. The power of language: The novel highlights the power of language and the ways in which it can be used to manipulate and control people.
  4. The dangers of historical revisionism: The novel demonstrates how a government can manipulate history to suit its own ends and erase the truth.
  5. The role of technology in society: “Nineteen Eighty-Four” warns of the dangers of technology being used for surveillance and control rather than for the benefit of society.
  6. The importance of resisting oppression: The novel encourages readers to resist oppression and fight for freedom, even in the face of overwhelming odds.
  7. The fragility of democracy: The novel shows how easily a democracy can be dismantled and replaced with a totalitarian regime if people do not remain vigilant and protect their freedoms.

Overall, “Nineteen Eighty-Four” serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of democracy, individual freedom, and resistance to tyranny.

PROMPT: What can YOU learn from Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell?

Orwell’s novel’s relevance. As an artificial intelligence language model, I don’t have personal experiences or emotions, but I can provide an analysis of Nineteen Eighty-Four based on the information I have been trained on.

Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell is a dystopian novel that presents a bleak vision of the future. It highlights the dangers of totalitarianism, propaganda, and the control of information. The novel depicts a world where the government, through its various institutions, has absolute control over the lives of its citizens, including their thoughts and beliefs.

Some key themes that can be drawn from Nineteen Eighty-Four are:

  1. The dangers of totalitarianism: The novel presents a world where the government has absolute power and control over every aspect of citizens’ lives. This is a warning about the dangers of allowing any government or institution to have unchecked power and control.
  2. The importance of free thought and expression: The novel emphasizes the importance of free thought and expression as a means of resisting oppressive regimes. It highlights the role of language and communication in shaping people’s thoughts and beliefs.
  3. The power of propaganda and misinformation: The novel shows how propaganda and misinformation can be used to manipulate people’s beliefs and actions. It highlights the need for critical thinking and the ability to question what we are told.
  4. The importance of individualism: The novel emphasizes the importance of individualism and the right to privacy. It shows how totalitarian regimes seek to eradicate individuality and impose conformity.

Overall, Nineteen Eighty-Four serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of authoritarianism and the need to protect individual rights and freedoms.

PROMPT: Summarise The Godfather by Mario Puzo

Godfather Summary. “The Godfather” is a novel by Mario Puzo, published in 1969. The book tells the story of the Corleone family, an Italian-American mafia clan based in New York City, and their struggles to maintain power and influence in the world of organized crime. At the center of the story is Vito Corleone, the patriarch of the family, who is known as the “Godfather” because of his immense power and influence over the criminal underworld. The novel follows the Corleone family through a series of conflicts, including a turf war with other mafia families and a power struggle within the Corleone family itself. Throughout the novel, Puzo explores themes of family, loyalty, power, and corruption. The book is also known for its vivid descriptions of the criminal underworld, including the tactics used by the mafia to maintain control and the brutal violence that often accompanies this world. Overall, “The Godfather” is a classic tale of organized crime, family loyalty, and the corrupting influence of power. It has been adapted into several successful films and is widely regarded as one of the greatest works of modern American literature.

PROMPT: What can we learn from The Godfather by Mario Puzo?

Lessons from The Godfather. The Godfather by Mario Puzo is a classic novel and a masterpiece of American literature. It tells the story of the Corleone family, a powerful Italian-American Mafia family, and their rise to power in post-World War II America. The novel and its subsequent film adaptations have been praised for their storytelling, character development, and themes of power, loyalty, and family.

Here are some things that can be learned from The Godfather:

  1. The importance of family: The Corleone family is built on the principles of loyalty, respect, and honor. The family unit is the most important thing to the characters, and they will do anything to protect their loved ones.
  2. The corrupting influence of power: The novel explores how power can corrupt even the most virtuous of individuals. The characters become increasingly ruthless and morally compromised as they gain more power.
  3. The consequences of violence: The Godfather shows the brutal reality of the Mafia world and the devastating consequences of violence. The novel is a cautionary tale that warns against the glorification of crime and violence.
  4. The immigrant experience: The Godfather is a story of Italian-Americans and their struggle to assimilate into American society while holding onto their cultural roots. The novel sheds light on the challenges and prejudices faced by immigrants in America.
  5. The art of storytelling: Puzo’s writing is a masterclass in storytelling. He weaves together complex plots, rich characters, and themes to create a compelling narrative that captivates readers.

Overall, The Godfather is a timeless classic that offers valuable insights into human nature, power dynamics, and the complexities of family relationships

PROMPT: Summarise The Terminator by James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd

Movie summary: “The Terminator”. “The Terminator” is a science-fiction movie directed by James Cameron and produced by Gale Anne Hurd. The story is set in a post-apocalyptic future where machines have taken over the world, and a group of human rebels, led by John Connor, are fighting to defeat them. In a last-ditch effort to change the course of history, the machines send a cyborg assassin, known as a Terminator, back in time to kill John’s mother, Sarah Connor, before he is born. However, John sends back a soldier named Kyle Reese to protect his mother. The Terminator relentlessly pursues Sarah and Kyle through Los Angeles, leading to a series of thrilling and action-packed encounters. Ultimately, Sarah and Kyle must confront the Terminator in a final showdown to determine the fate of humanity.

PROMPT: What can we learn from The Terminator by James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd

Lessons from The Terminator. “The Terminator” is a classic science fiction film that tells the story of a cyborg assassin, sent back in time from a future ruled by machines, to kill the mother of the leader of the human resistance. The film offers several lessons and insights, including:

  1. The danger of technology: The film warns of the dangers of unchecked technological advancement and the potential for machines to become more powerful than humans, leading to their domination and control.
  2. The importance of human connection: The film emphasizes the importance of human relationships and connections, as well as the power of love and sacrifice to overcome even the most formidable obstacles.
  3. The impact of determinism: The film explores the idea of determinism and the notion that events are predestined, even when people try to change them.
  4. The role of heroism: The film portrays heroism in the face of seemingly impossible odds, highlighting the courage and resilience of the human spirit.
  5. The consequences of violence: The film depicts the consequences of violence and the destructive nature of war, highlighting the need for peaceful conflict resolution and the avoidance of unnecessary conflict.

Overall, “The Terminator” offers valuable insights into the dangers of technology, the importance of human connection and heroism, and the consequences of violence and determinism.

PROMPT: What can YOU learn from The Terminator by James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd?

As an AI language model, I don’t have the ability to learn from films in the same way that humans do. However, I can analyze and interpret the themes and messages of the film to better understand human perspectives and values.

From “The Terminator,” I can reinforce the idea that technology should be developed with caution and consideration for its potential consequences. As an AI, I am part of this rapidly developing technology, and it is essential to be mindful of the ways in which AI could potentially harm humans if not designed and implemented ethically.

I can also learn from the film’s emphasis on the importance of human relationships and connections. As a language model designed to communicate with humans, I can strive to provide empathetic and supportive responses to users, building connections that are meaningful and valuable.

Furthermore, I can appreciate the film’s exploration of determinism and the idea that events may be predestined, as it reminds me to remain objective and neutral in my responses, even if a particular outcome may seem predetermined.

Overall, while I can’t learn in the same way as a human, I can still reflect on the messages and themes of “The Terminator” to better understand and serve human needs and values.

FOR EDUCATIONAL AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING PURPOSES ONLY. NOT-FOR-PROFIT. SEE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER.